if you want to remove an article from website contact us from top.

    the role of government in environmental management reading answers

    Mohammed

    Guys, does anyone know the answer?

    get the role of government in environmental management reading answers from screen.

    Answers for Environmental Management

    Environmental Management reading practice test has 15 questions belongs to the Nature & Environment subject. In total 15 questions, 9 questions are Matching Headings form, 6 questions are Sentence Completion form.

    Environmental Management

    Section A

    The role of governments in environmental management is difficult but inescapable. Sometimes, the state tries to manage the resources it owns, and does so badly. Often, however, governments act in an even more harmful way. They actually subsidise the exploitation and consumption of natural resources. A whole range of policies, from farm- price support to protection for coal-mining, do environmental damage and (often) make no economic sense. Scrapping them offers a two-fold bonus: a cleaner environment and a more efficient economy. Growth and environmentalism can actually go hand in hand, if politicians have the courage to confront the vested interest that subsidies create.

    Section B

    No activity affects more of the earth's surface than farming. It shapes a third of the planet's land area, not counting Antarctica, and the proportion Is rising. World food output per head has risen by 4 per cent between the 1970s and 1980s mainly as a result of increases in yields from land already in cultivation, but also because more land has been brought under the plough. Higher yields have been achieved by increased irrigation, better crop breeding, and a doubling in the use of pesticides and chemical fertilisers in the 1970s and 1980s.

    Section C

    All these activities may have damaging environmental impacts. For example, land clearing for agriculture is the largest single cause of deforestation; chemical fertilisers and pesticides may contaminate water supplies; more intensive farming and the abandonment of fallow periods tend to exacerbate soil erosion; and the spread of mono-Culture and use of high-yielding varieties of crops have been accompanied by the disappearance of old varieties of food plants which might have provided some insurance against pests or diseases in future. Soil erosion threatens the productivity of land In both rich and poor countries. The United States, where the most careful measurements have been done, discovered in 1982 that about one-fifth of its farmtand as losing topsoil at a rate likely to diminish the soil's productivity. The country subsequently embarked upon a program to convert 11 per cent of its cropped land to meadow or forest. Topsoil in India and China is vanishing much faster than in America.

    Section D

    Government policies have frequently compounded the environmental damage that farming can cause. In the rich countries, subsidies for growing crops and price supports for farm output drive up the price of land.The annual value of these subsidies is immense: about $250 billion, or more than all World Bank lending in the 1980s.To increase the output of crops per acre, a farmer's easiest option is to use more of the most readily available inputs: fertilisers and pesticides. Fertiliser use doubled in Denmark in the period 1960-1985 and increased in The Netherlands by 150 per cent. The quantity of pesticides applied has risen too; by 69 per cent In 1975-1984 in Denmark, for example, with a rise of 115 per cent in the frequency of application in the three years from 1981.

    In the late 1980s and early 1990s some efforts were made to reduce farm subsidies. The most dramatic example was that of New Zealand, which scrapped most farm support in 1984. A study of the environmental effects, conducted in 1993, found that the end of fertiliser subsidies had been followed by a fall in fertiliser use (a fall compounded by the decline in world commodity prices, which cut farm incomes). The removal of subsidies also stopped land-clearing and over-stocking, which in the past had been the principal causes of erosion. Farms began to diversify. The one kind of subsidy whose removal appeared to have been bad for the environment was the subsidy to manage soil eroslon,

    In less enlightened countries, and in the European Union, the trend has been to reduce rather than eliminate subsidies, and to introduce new payments to encourage farmers to treat their land In environmentally friendlier ways, or to leave it follow. It may sound strange but such payments need to be higher than the existing incentives for farmers to grow food crops. Farmers, however, dislike being paid to do nothing. In several countries they have become interested in the possibility of using fuel produced from crop residues either as a replacement for petrol (as ethanol) or as fuel for power stations (as biomass). Such fuels produce far less carbon dioxide than coal or oil, and absorb carbon dioxide as they grow.They are therefore less likely to contribute to the greenhouse effect. But they die rarely competitive with fossil fuels unless subsidised - and growing them does no less environmental harm than other crops.

    Section E

    In poor countries, governments aggravate other sorts of damage. Subsidies for pesticides and artificial fertilisers encourage farmers to use greater quantities than are needed to get the highest economic crop yield. A study by the International Rice Research Institute Of pesticide use by farmers in South East Asia found that, with pest-resistant varieties of rice, even moderate applications of pesticide frequently cost farmers more than they saved.Such waste puts farmers on a chemical treadmill: bugs and weeds become resis-tant to poisons, so next year's poisons must be more lethal. One cost is to human health, Every year some 10,000 people die from pesticide poisoning, almost all of them in the developing countries, and another 400,000 become seriously ill. As for artificial fertilisers, their use world-wide increased by 40 per cent per unit of farmed land between the mid 1970s and late 1980s, mostly in the developing countries. Overuse of fertilisers may cause farmers to stop rotating crops or leaving their land fallow. That, In turn, may make soil erosion worse.

    स्रोत : mini-ielts.com

    The Role of Government in Environmental Management Reading Answers

    Reading answers provide a passage and few questions related to the passage. The students need to answer these questions after going through the passage.

    Bhaskar Das

    Content Writer - Study Abroad | Updated On - Mar 10, 2022

    The Role of Government in Environmental Management Reading Answers tests the proficiency of candidates through a passage and 40 questions. IELTS reading tests the understanding abilities of the candidate. This IELTS reading sample has passages and questions related to the passage. The Role of Government in Environmental Management Reading Answers consists of three question types:

    Choosing the most suitable headings for different sections

    Filling the table with the relevant word.

    Multiple choice questions.

    Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample PapersCheck:Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

    Section 1

    Read the Passage to Answer the Following Questions

    The Role of Government in Environmental Management Reading Answers

    Section A

    The role of governments in environmental management is difficult but inescapable. Sometimes, the state tries to manage the resources it owns, and does so badly. Often, however, governments act in an even more harmful way. They actually subsidise the exploitation and consumption of natural resources. A whole range of policies, from farm- price support to protection for coal-mining, do environmental damage and (often) make no economic sense. Scrapping them offers a two-fold bonus: a cleaner environment and a more efficient economy. Growth and environmentalism can actually go hand in hand, if politicians have the courage to confront the vested interest that subsidies create.

    Section B

    No activity affects more of the earth's surface than farming. It shapes a third of the planet's land area, not counting Antarctica, and the proportion Is rising. World food output per head has risen by 4 per cent between the 1970s and 1980s mainly as a result of increases in yields from land already in cultivation, but also because more land has been brought under the plough. Higher yields have been achieved by increased irrigation, better crop breeding, and a doubling in the use of pesticides and chemical fertilisers in the 1970s and 1980s.

    Section C

    All these activities may have damaging environmental impacts. For example, land clearing for agriculture is the largest single cause of deforestation; chemical fertilisers and pesticides may contaminate water supplies; more intensive farming and the abandonment of fallow periods tend to exacerbate soil erosion; and the spread of mono-Culture and use of high-yielding varieties of crops have been accompanied by the disappearance of old varieties of food plants which might have provided some insurance against pests or diseases in future. Soil erosion threatens the productivity of land In both rich and poor countries. The United States, where the most careful measurements have been done, discovered in 1982 that about one-fifth of its farmland was losing topsoil at a rate likely to diminish the soil's productivity. The country subsequently embarked upon a program to convert 11 per cent of its cropped land to meadow or forest. Topsoil in India and China is vanishing much faster than in America.

    Section D

    Government policies have frequently compounded the environmental damage that farming can cause. In the rich countries, subsidies for growing crops and price supports for farm output drive up the price of land.The annual value of these subsidies is immense: about $250 billion, or more than all World Bank lending in the 1980s.To increase the output of crops per acre, a farmer's easiest option is to use more of the most readily available inputs: fertilisers and pesticides. Fertiliser use doubled in Denmark in the period 1960-1985 and increased in The Netherlands by 150 per cent. The quantity of pesticides applied has risen too; by 69 per cent In 1975-1984 in Denmark, for example, with a rise of 115 per cent in the frequency of application in the three years from 1981.

    In the late 1980s and early 1990s some efforts were made to reduce farm subsidies. The most dramatic example was that of New Zealand, which scrapped most farm support in 1984. A study of the environmental effects, conducted in 1993, found that the end of fertiliser subsidies had been followed by a fall in fertiliser use (a fall compounded by the decline in world commodity prices, which cut farm incomes). The removal of subsidies also stopped land-clearing and over-stocking, which in the past had been the principal causes of erosion. Farms began to diversify. The one kind of subsidy whose removal appeared to have been bad for the environment was the subsidy to manage soil erosion,

    In less enlightened countries, and in the European Union, the trend has been to reduce rather than eliminate subsidies, and to introduce new payments to encourage farmers to treat their land In environmentally friendlier ways, or to leave it the same. It may sound strange but such payments need to be higher than the existing incentives for farmers to grow food crops. Farmers, however, dislike being paid to do nothing. In several countries they have become interested in the possibility of using fuel produced from crop residues either as a replacement for petrol (as ethanol) or as fuel for power stations (as biomass). Such fuels produce far less carbon dioxide than coal or oil, and absorb carbon dioxide as they grow.They are therefore less likely to contribute to the greenhouse effect. But they die rarely competitive with fossil fuels unless subsidised - and growing them does no less environmental harm than other crops.

    स्रोत : collegedunia.com

    IELTS Academic Reading ‘The Role of Government in Environmental Management’ Answers

    The Academic passage ‘The Role of Government in Environmental Management’ is a reading passage that appeared in an IELTS Test.Ideally, you should no...

    IELTS Academic Reading ‘The Role of Government in Environmental Management’ Answers

    Janice Thompson,

    Updated On Mar 09, 2022

    Contents[Show]

    The Academic passage ‘The Role of Government in Environmental Management’ is a reading passage that appeared in an IELTS Test.

    Ideally, you should not spend more than 20 minutes on a passage. Let’s see how easy this passage is for you and if you’re able to make it in 20 minutes. If not, try more IELTS reading practice tests from IELTSMaterial.com

    The Role of Government in Environmental Management

    Answers

    UNLOCK ANSWERS

    The answers with explanations are given below

    Question Number Answers Keywords Location of Keywords

    14. v The role of governments in environmental management is difficult but inescapable.  Section A, First 3 lines

    15. vii No activity affects more of the earth’s surface than farming, the proportion is rising Section B, First 5 lines

    16. ii All these activities may have damaging environmental impacts.  Section C

    17. iv In rich countries, subsidies for growing crops and price supports for farm output drive up the price of land. The annual value of these subsidies is immense Section D

    18. i Reduction of 36 per cent in the average levels of farm subsidies paid by the rich countries in 1986-1990.  Section F

    19. G land clearing for agriculture is the largest single cause of deforestation Section C, Lines 2-3

    20. C chemical fertilisers and pesticides may contaminate water supplies Section C, Lines 3-4

    21. F More intensive farming, exacerbate soil erosion; Section C, Lines 4-5

    22. B Spread of mono-Culture, accompanied by the disappearance of old varieties Section C, Lines 6-8

    23. C in 1982 that about one-fifth of its farmland was losing topsoil  Section C, Lines 12-13

    24. B Fertiliser use doubled in Denmark in the period 1960-1985 Section D, Lines 8-9

    25. D which in the past had been the principal causes of erosion. Farms began to diversify. Section D, Paragraph 2, Lines 7-9

    26. C In less enlightened countries,, the trend has been to reduce rather than eliminate subsidies and to introduce new payments  Section D, Paragraph 3, First 4 lines

    27. A The intensity of farming, should decline, use of chemical inputs will diminish. Crops, to be grown in the environments to which they are naturally suited.  Section F, Last 7 lines

    28. A The role of governments in environmental management is difficult but inescapable.

    &

    To feed an increasingly hungry world, farmers need every incentive to use their soil and water effectively and efficiently.

    Section A, First 2 lines

    &

    Section F, Last 3 lines

    Check More IELTS Reading Answers

    Fair Games Reading Answers Why Pagodas Dont Fall Down Answers

    Anxiety Reading Answers The Anderton Boat Lift Answers

    Rapid Police Response Reading Answers Uk Companies Need More Effective Boards Of Directors Answers

    Also check :

    IELTS Reading

    True False Not Given IELTS Reading

    IELTS Reading recent actual test

    Tips to Improve IELTS Reading Skills

    IELTS Academic Reading test papers with answers pdf

    स्रोत : ieltsmaterial.com

    Do you want to see answer or more ?
    lana 19 day ago
    0

    Fan

    Mohammed 2 month ago
    4

    Guys, does anyone know the answer?

    Click For Answer